It pains me that IMAX movies are now mostly shown in 3D. What a shame.
-
-
Replying to @eli_schiff
@eli_schiff@weightshift I regret not seeing one of the hobbits in 48, now I’ll be forever curious.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mwichary
@mwichary@eli_schiff Very strange effect. It felt like watching a daytime soap — not cinematic, too real, too close up.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @weightshift
@weightshift@mwichary@eli_schiff It will eventually, inevitably, be the norm. I watched Fury Road recently at 100Hz. Let’s hope not.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mrb
@mrb@mwichary@eli_schiff On a 100hz TV? I can't imagine out-motioning the human eye. The human brain-eye is... romantic.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @weightshift
@weightshift@mrb@eli_schiff Interpolated 100Hz, you mean?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mwichary
@mwichary@weightshift@eli_schiff Yes, interpolated by the receiver, then projected. Felt like a cheap stage production compared to 24fps.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mrb
@mrb@weightshift@eli_schiff That’s what is fascinating to me: does it feel this way intrinsically, or just by association with (bad) TV?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mwichary
@mwichary@weightshift@eli_schiff And if so, will more exposure to good content eliminate that? (Most new TVs set this mode as default.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@mrb @weightshift @eli_schiff How would one test this. Kids? :·)
-
-
Replying to @mwichary
@mrb@weightshift@eli_schiff Also, of course, interpolated high frame rate ≠ recorded high frame rate.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mwichary
@mwichary@weightshift@eli_schiff The latter gives a worse effect but I did find The Hobbit at 48fps pretty terrible. Reserving judgment.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.