So all ya FB haters who apparently I follow here on the Twitter, legitimately and honestly: Can you help me understand why you hate FB so much? What am I missing? (If you can, please provide references to big claims :–)
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @rsms2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes
-
Replying to @mwichary
Yeah, I read this. Clearly FB didn’t actually cause the violence in Myanmar but its platform was exploited by people who did. It’s a tricky headline to that article where if you miss the word “used” you may think FB actually actively played a bad role (it was merely the stage.)
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @rsms
“Facebook has admitted it did not do enough to prevent the incitement of violence and hate speech in Myanmar.”https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/nov/06/facebook-admits-it-has-not-done-enough-to-quell-hate-in-myanmar …
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @mwichary
Yup. What I hear is that FB has preventive measures (actions, people, technology, rules) but felt they didn’t do enough. I think it’s a very different thing that (as some ppl imply) actively causing harm or inciting violence.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @rsms
This is arguing semantics in the shadow of a genocide. Simple thought exercise: imagine Myanmar today has Facebook not existed. Here is some reading on the platforms’ responsibility for curation and amplification of content: https://www.fastcompany.com/40454680/the-myth-of-the-neutral-silicon-valley-platform-is-crumbling …
3 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @mwichary
"imagine Myanmar today has Facebook not existed" It’s hard to say what cause the change that led to the 2015 elections. In 1990 the "National League for Democracy” won by vote but were denied victory. In 2015 they again won and took seat. Who knows, but maybe The Internet ...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
https://www.wired.com/story/how-facebooks-rise-fueled-chaos-and-confusion-in-myanmar/amp … Two paragraphs that stood out to me: “The riots wouldn’t have happened without Facebook.” And: “Facebook also had at least two direct warnings before the 2014 riots that hate speech was exploding on the platform and could have real-world consequences.”
-
-
There's also the size of audience in the country and the number of Burmese (let alone Shan, Karen etc) speakers in either product, policy or content moderation roles at facey at that time (~0). How can fb claim to have an informed view of platform when don't ustand the content?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.