I have never seen footnotes done this way. I can’t decide whether this is lazy or genius.pic.twitter.com/b0iB8MdmnN
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The problem with the OP is that you still have an unresolved horizontal callback that can end up on the wrong side of the tracks.
Yeah, asides work well for me. The requirements are: 1. Easy to discover supplementary content & judge if it's worthwhile. 2. Easy to return to original content after consuming supplementary content. 3. Easy to bypass supplementary content if judged unnecessary.
Another thing I’d consider is a version of:https://twitter.com/mwichary/status/1068043425885253633 …
I don’t think one design is superior over the other. As @mwichary points out, it depends on the type of content (prose, scientific, …) and number of footnotes per page (one, two, ten, …). Inline emphasizes the notes and provides context but may also interrupt the reading flow.
Yeah. Funnily enough the original typewritten stuff at the top feels awful to me for what it does (who needs a full reference straight away? + it’s nice to see all references together in one block), but I can imagine it working for longer text parentheticals.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.