During my research I’ve found many keyboards that felt awful, looked bad, or were conceptually bankrupt. But it was only yesterday that I found the vilest of keyboards, an idea so cursed that I almost don’t want to talk about it – as if even doing that would give it credibility.
-
-
Four digits is not enough, of course. And so, the poor, maligned keyboard had to help – a big plus “key” was cut in half, and another key was added. A scroll key, toggling between two halves of a number, was added.pic.twitter.com/GHnGkZOz1J
Show this thread -
Imagine needing to drag your cheap, unpleasant plastic stylus, and scratch a rectangle of metal… just to SEE THE WHOLE RESULT. It’s beyond gruesome.
Show this thread -
As with every proper beast, this one had many names: Royal Litton IC-90, Feiler FC-100. They all aged just about as well as you can imagine.pic.twitter.com/9PV1U9kVCA
Show this thread -
Luckily, as far as I can tell, there was no Royal Digital II or Royal Digital I. It was only the less fortunate alternate universes that were graced with the calculators that I assume had two or even just ONE digit – and more “keys” you’d have to claw to move between.
Show this thread -
In our reality, to add insult to injury, this was all in the early 1970s, the decade that gave us beam springs and Selectric II – lauded as possibly the most pleasant keyboards ever made, and ones whose design decisions inform keyboards even today.pic.twitter.com/P1Kcg4UOnL
Show this thread -
And then, somewhere among them, there was this calamity. Yes, eventually a Royal Digital 5 was made, with a more proper keyboard.pic.twitter.com/TjQH90ypS1
Show this thread -
But we’ll have to live knowing that Royal Digital III and IV existed once, these wretched, grotesque contraptions that were as far away from touch typing as humanly – or at this point, inhumanly – possible. And we can do nothing about it.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.