I’m actually surprised we haven’t seen that kind of substitution in English fonts, too!
-
-
This is only possible thanks to the ambiguity of low resolution.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There is a precedent in the world of typewriters. In early ones, capital O served as zero, and capital I or later lowercase l as 1 (and similarly in other languages).pic.twitter.com/vRa03eZ45q
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Cyrilic has "Ze" which looks like a 3, and as a result the key for 3 used to sometimes be left out of the typewriter's keyboard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ze_(Cyrillic) …)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MathieuLoutre @Tosche_E and
The fonts were usually aware, too, for example here where the “el” ended up looking too much like “one”:pic.twitter.com/BDoJ1c5blY
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mwichary @MathieuLoutre and
I meant that Ч doesn’t look like 4 in a good resolution. My point is that the substitution was forgiven because the design was crude.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Tosche_E @MathieuLoutre and
I don’t quite follow how it relates to my comment, though? You can imagine O = 0 and 1 = I and other glyph reuse for English working in pixel fonts because of crudeness, too. I have never seen those, though. Just the (possible) Cyrillic example above.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mwichary @MathieuLoutre and
It’s the degree of ambiguity that low resolution can grant. I can swallow 1/l, 0/O, or 3/З easier than 4/Ч or 2/Ζ.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tosche_E
Have you seen any arcade pixel fonts missing zero or one or three?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mwichary
Yeah, missing zero was in my presentation (Drag Race).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Ah, thanks!!! I must have missed it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.