I find those arguments pretty bizarre. A strength of preregistration is that it clearly distinguishes confirmatory and exploratory analyses. RS’s argument basically boils down to ‘we shouldn’t need preregistration to do that’.
Would preregistration speed or slow progress in science? Interesting discussion on philosophy of science with Rich Shiffrin https://incurablynuanced.blogspot.com/2018/11/would-preregistration-speed-or-slow.html?spref=tw …
-
-
-
Yeah, I’m confused too. I’m trying to imagine a counterfactual world where preregistration is the norm. How specifically would Science speed up if the norm disappeared?
-
Here is a link to a talk Richard Shiffrin gave a few weeks ago at the Rotman Institute of Philosophy
@rotmanphilo on this topichttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6b2665t3P7U&index=11&list=PLkMaaEPd7InLvBUBf7WyGhXgymO6hrily … -
Stuart Firestein had a similar take in his talk (but a somewhat different focus)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vewGy_sVm4&index=11&list=PLkMaaEPd7InLvBUBf7WyGhXgymO6hrily …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We are working on data analyses for a big project and find too many hints for better analyses. What is important is transparent and complete reporting of methods and analyses, not where we came from.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.