I think the key distinction here is that your tweet talks about “choice” while Jason’s talked about what’s “required.” Autonomy makes all the difference.
-
-
-
Agree. Though in my first job it was required, but they made it very clear when I applied what the hours were like so it was a choice for me to take the job.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Like retirement savings, it's difficult to play catch-up later in career for sub-optimized early years. I know from experience! ;)
-
The issue IMO is whether your company *requires* it. I have also worked many 100 hour weeks and it was a valuable learning experience but I would not want to create a work culture where that is expected.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
at the end of the day it should be all about "getting shit done" regardless of how long it takes.
@jasonfried so when@basecamp started, no one worked nights/WKND? In the startup world it's almost required to at least have that mindset that you are not going to have banker hrs. -
Why would we work longer when we were getting started? It’s always assumed that there’s more work to do in the early days. Not true. There’s *always* more work to do than you have time for. And business only gets harder, not easier.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Functional extra hours = you choose to put everything in as you're getting something out (satisfaction, promotion, recognition etc) Dysfunctional extra hours = you have to put extra in and get little back to keep up with all the headless chicken behaviour! Big difference.
-
TBH my first job was kind of the second but I still learned a ton.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
