been saying this for years
-
-
-
Touché. Just to reiterate my view: I maintain that "# of phones in custody" is a metric of limited value (i.e., it's an insufficient and uninteresting metric to get from LEAs). But if the AG is going to make this argument, then he has a responsibility to corroborate the assertion
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I think the inability to measure the problem *is* relevant. I’d love to know how crypto has changed investigations; from a requirements engineering perspective, it’s a prereq to any solution. The fact that LE doesn’t know the # says basic groundwork hasn’t been done on LE’s side.
-
Measuring the problem is certainly relevant. I just don't think that the absolute number of investigations is important. I'm far more interested in forming a taxonomy of scenarios and learning their relative frequency, eg does the locked phone belong to the victim or suspect?
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.