Richard Lockett

Or just go back to selling the program at a REASONABLE price not 600 something dollars. and send updates like other software do. So that it wont be like were just renting their program.

Other then that, they need to seriously rework their plans to better suit their customers. Possibly hire American costumer representatives in their main company so that their is no language barrier.

Whats funny to me and maybe not to them is that they want me to give give them a good evaluation, I will admit that they have been pretty good with subscription when i have no way to pay for them at certain times.

Not only this, but there plans are inflexible too. You HAVE TO stay on the one year contract or else if you cancel you have to pay 50% of the remaining contract costs. They call that a student discount plan?!

How is it that i cannot place a hold on the contract when need be, but they can change the price of the same contract to an higher amount. I was only able to find out about this after checking back on their website.

Another issue that bothers me about Adobe is that while I am on the Student Teacher one year contract ( yes i said contract, even though they call it a subscription plan) which price is $21.99, I discover that the price increases to 29.99 the next year.

Firstly, it is apparent to me that while Adobe is located in California, their costumer service center is located in India. This presented a problem for me personally because i had a hard time understanding the representative.

Is it just me or has anyone else noticed that you cant get good customer service with Adobe. I cannot understand why a large company like adobe has to treat their customers this way.

Lets look at the facts here: First, how is a 12 year old getting a medication that is as strong as opioid. secondly, those are among this list are most likely to have gotten the medication in a quantity over 30.

Here is another fact from the ASAM: Of the 20.5 million Americans 12 or older that had a substance use disorder in 2015, 2 million had a substance use disorder involving prescription pain relievers and 591,000 had a substance use disorder involving heroin.

While the medication is addictive, it is the misuse of the medication that causes a higher chance of addiction.

I feel bad for the parents who teens are addicted to pain killers, but I ask the question? Why were the medications kept out of reach and in safe locked place.

People are quick to blame the medication without looking at how it was prescribed.

Here is my question: Since it was known that women have a higher chance of becoming addicted to pain medicine such as Vicodin, or oxycodone. or the less potent medication Tylenol 3, why were they given higher doses then men?

According to the American Society of Addiction Medicine, Women are more likely to have chronic pain. Furthermore, they stated that while women may have a greater chance of becoming dependent or addicted, they were prescribed higher doses then men.

Therefore i propose that masses, the people who the government is suppose to protect speak up for our rights, stand up for what we need and let the government know we need a change.

They believe that: Gone is the days when Americans would stand up for their rights. But this is one American who will not stay quite while they take away the basic needs of: Food, Money, and Medicine.

Does anyone else see a pattern? I sure do! The government wants Americans to be complacent and willing to take any stupid rule which they deem is "right" for the American public.

These regulations follow along the same line as the regulations that have caused the government to cut food stamps and reduce social security to what they are today.

However, the US government who following the hysteria over the "Opiate epidemic" still insisted on enforcing ludicrous overly controlling regulations which have yet again hurt the American public.