Missing here is any justification for why the US Senate would have jurisdiction over YouTube algorithmshttps://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/05/senator-warns-youtube-algorithm-may-be-open-to-manipulation-by-bad-actors …
-
-
the real paranoia is the fear that even censorship isn’t working.. they know they’re losing the battle to “Russia propaganda”.. which of course is simply code for anything that challenges cutthroat capitalism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's how censorship actually works in America and in the "Free World" in general. You're not going to pass an actual law, but your regulatory power means that a few subtle hints can induce media entities to self-censor in order to avoid closer governmental scrutiny.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Step by step they march us to repeal another of our 1st Amendment Rights. They already has taken most of our fourth Amendments rights away.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My guess: Democrats would argue their power to legislate YouTube algorithms is based in Interstate Commerce Clause.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
The Guardian refers to “far right conspiracy website InfoWars”; meanwhile pushing a conspiracy that Russians meddled with YouTube to gift Trump the election
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.