Maybe this is a dumb question, but: if The Memo contains misleading information and paints a false narrative (certainly possible) wouldn’t the proper course be to ... release the memo, so it can be publicly evaluated, and its misleading/false nature can be demonstrated?
-
-
But what if we don't get documents B, C, & D and are only left with the incomplete story by reading A alone? So, in this case, A will make it seem like dossier was key in getting FISA on Page, while B,C,D might show other reasons which obviated need for FISA court to rely on it.
-
That A might not provide a fully contextualized elucidation of the facts doesn’t justify concealing A
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I suspect the people that don't want it exposed & I bet both sides have their own dirty laundry in it, hence gridlock. Both would love their own redacted revelation be the one released.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.