Dem cheerleaders for sanctions -- a weapon of war -- are chronically incapable of formulating an actual argument for why sanctions on Russia are desirable policy. All they have is platitudes like "hacking our democracy"https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/958173037765054464 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Been like that for decades.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The default establishment position is hawkishness, because anything else is “isolationist”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think you're on to something. Sanctions usually hurt the poorest and most powerless in these countries, not the leaders. OTOH isn't it analogous to not doing business w/ people/companies you don't like?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting, N Korea wants us to drop our hostile stance- sanctions, military exercises w/ S Korea. Hawks are “NK’s running out of time,” want denuclearization prior to negotiations- no mention of meetings w/ S Korea, tho S Korea shares de-nuke goals, starting w/ rel building..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Pay attention to the news about the memo this week. You are finally going to learn what this whole Russian collusion yarn was really about.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.