as far as his claims regarding Russian interference, it is a perfectly adequate description. hasn't had a security clearance in years https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/927961037072105473 …
-
-
we're talking about his recent work on Russia, right? why are you bringing that up
-
Because "hasn't held a security clearance in years" is a nonsensical standard for dismissing someone.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
In that case he was talking about things from when he did have a security clearance, wasn't he? Or at least things that he might have relevant knowledge of. Is that the case here?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.