Whatever you think about Assange, he's got a point here. Media handling of that story this week was bizarre.https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/923936210292297728 …
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
Your agreeing with Assange's framing of the issue demonstrates how willing you are to buy into that framing. Which is insane.
5 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
-
Replying to @mtracey
I didn't say inaccurate. I said insane. Show me the person of consequence who said CA story was proof of collusion.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @mtracey
Show me the person of consequence who said CA story was proof of collusion. He can't. He's insane.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @johnastoehr
Michael Tracey Retweeted Amy Siskind 🏳️🌈
Here's just one example from 2 seconds of looking.https://twitter.com/Amy_Siskind/status/923604221819260929 …
Michael Tracey added,
2 replies 3 retweets 24 likes -
Amy is a leader of Resistance Twitter, but... ok. Here's queen Rachel making similar insinuations.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aL5mXeChF8 …
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
I take it back. Your buying into Assange's framing isn't insane. You are. Maddow does not use same language, not even same point.
9 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.