These counterfactuals are @mtracey's stock-in-trade. Dossier was always opposition research. That Clinton camp paid for it not a surprise.https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/923376726746501120 …
No, it wasn't. You're wrong. It was reported for the first time this week.
-
-
NYT report from January. Not sure how new revelations - campaign rather than supporters - would have made "radically different" narrative.pic.twitter.com/OxBhlCaKOg
-
Because a “supporter” could be virtually anyone, whereas we now know it was funded by the highest rungs of the campaign apparatus.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.