Don't you think it's fair to criticize the mainstream media's coverage from the 2016 election?
-
-
-
Yes, and I have repeatedly, but the idea that the problem was excess scrutiny of Hillary's problems is ridiculous.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
A lot of people are saying "Who cares about the emails now!" but not "There was so much at stake we should have picked a better candidate"
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Nate is still smarting from his epic failure to predict the outcome of the election.
-
This is patently false. 538 said trump had a ~ 30% chance of winning.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
BOTH candidates were inherently flawed and the people who don't see that are blind to their allegiances, that applies to BOTH sides
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It hasn't even been a full year and they're assuming we've forgotten that more air time was given to stories involving Trump than Clinton
-
Right; Silver is misleading. With Hillary, it was just the one story. The attention on Trump was greater but diffused over many stories.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fales equivalence = the blindness to Trump's horrifying failings that allowed him to become president
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Covered? You mean propaganda about there's nothing to see here & she did nothing wrong was coverage? Not DNC talking points? Nah.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
For every time I don't agree with you, you hit the nail on the head nine times. Don't ever change.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I read that comment as being critical of the press' ability to understand what's important and what's not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ironically, at the workplace coffee station amongst mixed employees, is the discussion on how horrible the media is, Trump? Not so much.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jack Posobiec's quote was spot on (and those of us who served in Intel get it) "never shared classified intel outside of a SCIF."
#crucialThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Discredited poll analyst now just spews half-baked nonsense. . .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mtracey trying to cover his ass for helping elect the most vile creature to enter politics since Hitler. It's not working Mike.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Look at you defending mainstream media
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.