No, it's not. It's an insistence that no claim in the original cited tweet is now somehow retroactively incorrect. Which is absolutely true.
-
-
-
Rather than repairing to vague "rationality" jargon, explain with logical precision what should now be regarded as incorrect.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I conceded that already. Keep yelling at the wind, bro.
-
We will when you stop defending The Traitor Clinton.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
She initiated physical contact!!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I will grant that the statement is technically "logical." It is impossible to know with certainty that HRC wouldn't have been worse. 1/2
-
However, if you actually *believe* that, you are stupider than the president, and that is saying something. 2/2
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In the wise words of Heather C, did you have a brain tumor for breakfast?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the best parody account I have ever read.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't blame me, I voted Gary.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
At least you got a rt by Richard (Nazi) Spencer. So I guess it was worth it right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
