Weird. Nowhere does it say that in the article you linked. Just says security aid.
-
-
Replying to @_celia_bedelia_
That person is a well-known translator and easily identifiable. How else do you think Obama and Putin were able to communicate?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
Okay. Cool. My bad! Still a fourth person in the photo. And still the problem wasn't only "just the translator" and trump.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_celia_bedelia_
That's why I only called attention to the use of the Russian translator.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
But the issue with the trump meeting was it was covert, no pictures, no us note taker. Just him, putin, and translator. This is clearly dif
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @_celia_bedelia_
Again: one of the "issues" repeatedly cited had to do with the use of the Russian translator, so that's the one I commented on in this tweet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
And you're still acting like the issue was the translator and not the US note taker.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @_celia_bedelia_
It's true that there was apparently no note taker for Trump's meeting. But one of the other "issues" when the story broke was the translator
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
The issue was that it was trump, Putin, and only a translator. And always was....it was never "only a Russian translator"
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @_celia_bedelia_ @mtracey
Your both-sidesisms are exhausting dude.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
-
New conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.