Seems very plausible that the president blocking people on Twitter could constitute a First Amendment abridgment http://www.nationallawjournal.com/legaltimeshome/id=1202792711986 …
-
-
They target and censor people on the right for no reason. Hardly seems they're keeping their commitmwnt
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
By the same token, then, should Twitter be allowed to ban users?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
tell that to Milo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the upshot of all this is that Twitter is forced to stop shadowbanning and otherwise throttling conservatives, great!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm a trump supper but this Not about twitter obligation. Trump is a state actor, State actor can't restrict particular ppl or content.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not a 1st Amendment obligation, but an obligation to accommodate all users, similar to the Masterpiece Cake Shop case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When you're not talking about Russia, you make compelling arguments
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only when state actors are involved
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"zero. Zero is certain!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nope
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.