Seems very plausible that the president blocking people on Twitter could constitute a First Amendment abridgment http://www.nationallawjournal.com/legaltimeshome/id=1202792711986 …
-
-
You do not need to have a Twitter account to view a tweet
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ACLU won vs city hall when frmr Mayor Hales excluded Joe Walsh frm city council for outburst -Wheeler modified it.. https://www.google.com/amp/s/articles.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/03/portland_city_council_passes_r.amp …
-
Actually Walsh filed the claim himself vs Portland. judge found his ban frm city council undue burden to access govt http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2015/12/federal_judge_finds_portland_m.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So Twitter can ban people based on their viewpoints as a "private" forum, but it also counts as a public forum when Trump is concerned?
-
When the President uses Twitter in his official capacity, thereby creating a public forum, there are a different set of considerations.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.