Seems very plausible that the president blocking people on Twitter could constitute a First Amendment abridgment http://www.nationallawjournal.com/legaltimeshome/id=1202792711986 …
-
-
Blocking users based on critical comments they've made infringes on their First Amendment right to engage in the forum. Straightforward.pic.twitter.com/M4VGXgg3Kx
-
pro-Trump trolls who posture as warriors for Free Speech but don't care about this very obvious abridgment are, unsurprisingly, a bit dull.
-
Relatedly, this is a key point. Despite being a private company, Twitter still has certain 1st Amendment obligationshttps://twitter.com/JameelJaffer/status/886039474685214721 …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Every bit of Gov communication belongs on Gov channels - w/o exception. Why can't Gov+Press grasp that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Though there might be legal issues, nothing useful is going to come from focusing on this this, apart from more distraction from real issues
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@realDonaldTrump is his personal account,@POTUS is the official public account.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They can respond via the
#USpostalServiceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The high prices of satellite prevent me from watching him on tv, can I sue them?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If twitter didn't artificially raise the trolls to the top of his threads this would never have been an issue
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.