Comey suggests Loretta Lynch ordered him to obfuscate on behalf of the Clinton campaignpic.twitter.com/m1XYwZ9IMk
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Hillary lost. Can we move on please?
"Move on" as in ignore revelatory testimony from the former FBI director that suggests potentially corrupt conduct?
Lets say exchange. Trump wld b impeached & Hillary/AG wld b possibly charged , convicted or vindicated. Okay sounds good 2 me, let's do this
Your the only guy on @TYTPolitics that's seems the be honest fair and unbiased, from what I've seen from you so far.
Careful Michael-too much truth and TYT will fire you!
Sure. It appears Lynch should have been fired. Now, let's talk current POTUS.
You're initial skepticism is beginning to look very misjudged. No?
He's an exemplar of /their/ honesty and virtue.
It does.
YES, it applies. Lynch should have NEVER had a meeting w/ Bill Clinton. Just like Trump shdn't have had those meetings w/ Comey.
Anymore "Gotcha's"???
They're just trying to distract from the obstruction of Justice by AG Loretta Lynch.
I am a liberal and I am absolutely OK with an investigation of Loretta Lynch. If there something there all Americans need to know
So you want to focus on the DNC and not the traitor? Priorities man
yeah, sure. so what? Lynch's actions seem sketchy. you think that description is enough to bring a case against her?
Yes, it does apply. Its also a billion degrees of magnitude less important for myriad reasons that should be obvious to anyone with a brain
1) no one obstructed justice 2) hrc is not president 3) its dickering over a semantic usage while the republic burns to the goddamned ground
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.