Also, note @drewharwell making sure to add that the author is "a Pulitzer winner," as if that's supposed to insulate her from criticism.
-
-
-
More evidence that gratuitous credentialism is the main function of the Journalism Award Racket.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Nobody asserted any conspiracy. At the time I (foolishly) RT'd your tweet last night, the paragraph was 'literally' not in the article.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
But but she is a Pulitzer winner!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lets all remember, WaPo is a for profit corporate paper that--like the NYT--has always served established power. Add to that $600 mil CIA $.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.