#Resistance devotees who assumed the ACLU was a standard-fare liberal advocacy group not pleased tonight.https://twitter.com/aclu/status/857413652718026753 …
-
-
Complementary
@ACLU_NorCal statement explains how Berkeley's actions resulted in the curtailment of protected speech.pic.twitter.com/6GG8qRlyb7
-
So all anybody has to do is threaten violence any time someone they don't like is going to speak. Easy peezy. What could possibly go wrong?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 8 more replies
-
-
-
They offered her a different day which would pose a smaller risk. Which she declined.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Aren't you on TYT? Ask your "progressive" buddies what they think.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Threats of violence rnt protected under the 1st amendment but they should be.I'm 4 free speech of all kinds.Speech shouldn't be criminalized
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ann Coulter canceled. Berkley did not cancel.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ann Coulter has helped incite violence against Muslims for over a decade. Nasty old harpie got what she deserved.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
was the civil war good?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
shit. easy peasy. coulter can talk to millions whenever she wants to. free speech isn't 'here's my venue' speech.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the 'state' didn't stifle anything. coulter can speak to millions. she isn't guaranteed a podium at berkeley. period.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not about stifling speech. It's about a university having an obligation and right to responsibly manage campus venues.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ironically you're criticizing free speech. Threats of violence SHOULD be protected under the 1st amendment.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.