In other words, we now know there were no new emails
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Given that they hadn't been reviewed, the FBI probably should have reviewed them first before going public
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
are you -trying- to expose yourself as a sycophant in this comment exchange?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Point is that it would have been responsible to verify actual novelty of emails before calling attn, esp given wide skepticism about novelty
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
replicative of already-reviewed emails.....aka, not new
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, but ontologically they weren't new in itself nor by itself. Ok, they were new in a sense the investigation had not had them then but...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
reading comprehension isn't your strong suit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
They'd done a server pull & therefore had every reason to expect this new collection was entirely duplicative. Review confirmed that.
-
In short, real ignorant to presume unique MD5# values mean a doc is "new."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To make a public statement which Comey did by sending that letter to congress before the emails were investigated, swung the election.
-
Spin it as you want, but a totally bogus investigation, and a total break with FBI norms cost HRC the election.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.