He assumed it was Russia or China, then realised China was not likely, therefore by process of elimination deduced it was Russia.
-
-
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
In other words it was the conclusion they wanted.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And did so without access to the DNC servers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's not a hack, if Wikileaks is to be believed (and they have a great track record). Was a leak until concrete evidence to the contrary
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
He deduced it was in his best interest to eliminate all options unsuitable for blaming Russia.
-
Yes basically. They made it look "scientific", but put in pre-bias by totally ignoring non Russia related scenarios in their examination.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In other words
#RooshansDidIt IRL = CIA Spooks a Spoofing Funny how often those#DamnedFacts make liars out of partisans & CorporateFascistspic.twitter.com/RTRPQZD6zq
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
we should start wars that way...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So basically the science of guesstimation...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Forensics as a science is based on a law of excluded middle. Here, initial hypothesis was corroborated without a proper advocatus diaboli.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
instead of real hard evidence which doesn't exist....just as we thought
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As opposed to a confession? Testimony of the hackers involved? What else is there?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.