You can't even articulate which contentions are wrong. You're just mad. I get it. This too shall pass.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey @scooniepenn
I've articulated them. Hell I think you even know it's stupid. Women are 53% of the electorate. White women 38%.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
when you include the biggest subgroup and add all others but 1 you can say anything is a "majority."
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @ArmandoNDK @armandodkos
So Bruenig's statement -- "Women and people of color make up the majority of the Trump coalition" -- is literally correct.
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
It remains literally the new standard for stupid. I think you're being dishonest but maybe you are this stupid.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArmandoNDK @armandodkos
So your position is, "This contention might be literally, unassailably, mathematically correct... but it's stupid."
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
Yes it's stupid. You seem to think only false statements are stupid.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArmandoNDK @mtracey
it's a misleading and dishonest attempt to pretend POC are part of "majority" of Trump coalition. My Hundley-Baylor story explains
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArmandoNDK @armandodkos
That's not what
@MattBruenig asserts though. You are making up claims no one made and attributing them to him.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mtracey @MattBruenig
in a way that makes it worse because that's literally the title of the piece.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Bruenig states that 54% of Trump voters "were women and people of color." That's correct, so the title is correct.
-
-
-
what's funny is he could have said "men and POC" make up a majority of Trump voters. But not the same effect right?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.