Um, how much crack are you on? @mtracey
-
-
-
There are enough straw men and bad statistical failures in that post to cause spontaneous combustion.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why don't you just come out and officially join the alt-right already?
-
Yes, sharing this post written by a socialist intellectual is definitely indicative of affinity for the alt-right. Moron.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
And whites make up a majority of the anti-Trump coalition. Maybe the calculations you are doing don't make a lot of sense.
-
Having not written the post, I didn't do any calculations. And you can't rebut the post's contentions on the merits.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
cc
@SarahLerner@hellbentpod WTF is this guy on about! -
Do you know how to read?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Technically a true statement but an alternative fact, nevertheless.
-
Because facts which you happen to not like must be "alternative."
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The headline is literally true but 40.32 out of Trump's 46.21 points were white. A little misleading to include POC.
-
I think it's important in the context of how Trump was smeared as the "anti-women, anti-people-of-colour" candidate.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@MattBruenig Statistically correct but highly misleading. By same trick, a majority of Hitler voters were men and Jews. -
Matt's using the fact that white women alone are ~1.8% less votes than the white male Trump supporters. 1/2
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
he seems really proud of it


- 1 more reply
-
-
-
You must have failed Algebra I in school.
-
and continued to fail at life.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
I really needed that laugh Where in the world did that asshat get that idea? Breitbart? Fox? It's insane
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.