It's not a matter of them personally "desiring" WW3, it's political circumstances conspiring to make it increasingly likely.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
One is at Syria's invitation (Russia), the other is an invading force (USA).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Troops have more sense than DC neocons.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Spent 6 months sharing Sarajevo with them-trooos on the ground are pretty professional (but boy do they drink a lot...)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh, I don't know, maybe WWIII? After it starts, Hillary would cry out, "Mission Accomplished!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
The stupidity of all of this, the horror in the cost of human life, is mind numbing. No "anti-War" movement in US?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
oh yeah
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like plenty of talent in the right place at the right time. James Mattis recently took a trip; we are good?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hopefully this could be an opening to cooperation and deescalstion, but somehow the Pentagon (or something else) will fuck it up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.