Since everyone is so concerned about "normalization," it's now "normal" to cast communicating with Russian officials as inherently sinister.
-
-
neo-mccarthyism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that's not the issue w/ sessions tho.. LYING about speaking w/ Russian ambassador SHOULD spark suspicion
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No. It's because he lied about it in the hearings.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
which party seems more Hitlerian?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's most destructive is lying about it, esp under oath, so why risk it if there's nothing there?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're mistaken sir. He's not under suspicion of treason. He went in front of Congress & live broadcast audience & perjured himself
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
He then perjured himself about it. What do you think they talked about?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
I'd love to see an analysis of past administrations and contact they had with foreign governments prior to being elected.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
either you are disingenuous or do you do not know the definition of "merely"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But some interlocutors are more equal than others. Right,
@chuckschumer and @NancyPelosi?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@mtracey I think is more that he lied about it. If you're not doing anything sinister, why lie? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
how about lying under oath while testifying before the Senate? As always, it's the coverup.
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.