Twitter's standards for when to impose "bans" are clearly arbitrary and therefore highly susceptible to exploitationhttps://twitter.com/cwarzel/status/818160206702084097 …
-
-
I wrote a few months ago on why vesting Silicon Valley demigods with this kind of power is dangerous:https://medium.com/mtracey/the-tech-overlords-will-not-protect-you-on-arthur-chu-byyourlogic-and-harassment-d303a027866e?source=linkShare-467b4a43001c-1483901156 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
he was stalking a married woman, and it was getting really creepy, I'm sure he found it hilarious
-
So people ought to be banned based on "creepiness"? That's the standard?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
is there a single example of a popular left-wing account being banned?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
rule of men vs rule of law in absence of lack of transparency.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
If anything, the bar for "harassing" a power user should be higher because they have a more public persona
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.