It used to be that granting anonymity was frowned upon less it served a very specific journalistic purpose. Remember that? The good ol' days
-
-
-
Now anonymity is granted whenever some "official" has a rumor to spread about Russia. And no one objects, because they're in a Trump Frenzy.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Still waiting for a good reason we should trust/believe intel "officials" who leak details of the Presidential Daily Brief to
@CNNThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Obama admin used leaks themselves and continues to, but also has a horrible record of prosecuting leakers harshly.
@mtraceyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
I mean. Deepthroat. Right? And if I learned anything from Watergate, if POTUS makes CIA mad, then "smoking gun" is found.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
oh ffs. They are going to get nukes reigned down on all of us. This isn't a damn game!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Any evidence that other countries access US intelligence via same method employed by Russia? NSA has 80,000 private contractors.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
OMG! A "smoking gun"? Well, we can't allow the "smoking gun" to take the form of...I dunno, laughing Putin?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pls keep on reporting
#RealFakeNews@CNN People are supporting independent media which debunks the#RealFakenews on@CNN &@MSNBCThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Don't forget "journalism" credo of protecting these intel cyber world sources. World before desk = dangerous place
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-How convenient. For them.
@amborinThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I thought they were supposed to label fake news, now
-
Except for when they are the ones creating it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Doesn't say "go-betweens" are named* in report. Could be more "trust me."
-
That's exactly what I was thinking. If the go betweens are the hackers, who passed to Russians, why not named?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Democrats or McCain (same thing).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.