Can we banish the term "interference" to describe what Russia is alleged to have done. It's vague, euphemistic, and invites distortion.
-
-
-
Bingo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you repeat yourself; do they ever push anything for non-self serving reasons?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this issue already had a name, DNC leaks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Plus it invites the counter argument of incidental contact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
they're attempting parallel reconstruction in the public eye. Can't go after Putin for shifting public opinion so false attribution
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They can't call the interference "propaganda" either, 'cause it's true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
At Christmas, I discussed w/ local DNC organizer...... "So....what hurt the campaign was finding out the truth about them?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.