You can dispute some of this piece while recognizing that @mtracey's take is closer to reality than @mattyglesias'.https://medium.com/mtracey/dear-future-historians-a-note-on-matthew-yglesias-38296365187f#.vlhx28pcz …
-
-
I think his update was fine (though it should've had more detail), but the points about his initial editorializing seem reasonable.
-
Well the issuance of the Oct. 28 letter is what's supposed to have been so egregious. That's what people are focusing on.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
For starters, he said that you or I would be in trouble if we did what Clinton did.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thats just silly. The argument is his letter influenced the election despite him not looking at the emails.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can disagree with the argument thats fine or have another take. But it does exist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.