No, it doesn't, Michael. There is nothing saying that the Maryland facility is a "spy base." Where do you see that?
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Did you click on the article?pic.twitter.com/7JM1soAmkh
5 replies 10 retweets 49 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
That is not evidence presented by the government. That is a poorly written story, & it does not reflect the information presented.
4 replies 3 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
You'll have to take it up with the two Baltimore Sun reporters, then. They are always reliable in my experience.
@iduncan5 replies 3 retweets 32 likes -
Are these the same professional journalists that altered "spy base" to " retreat" when took fire ?
6 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
senior admin. officials stressed on briefing call earlier that the facility was being used for intel
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
"Spy base" was the hed and lede; it's now neither place, because the govt never said that. Anything inaccurate there?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think spy base is fair characterization of what they called an "intelligence compound" on call.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Then why was it changed in the article?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
we decided to revise it as we did more reporting and explain more full what we do and don't know.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
ok
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.