Old Michael Tracey: No proof of Russian interference. New Michael Tracey: Okay, if there was Russian interference it was a good thing.https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/814605479418744832 …
-
-
& the phrase 'Russia hacked the election' has misleadingly implied they hacked vote machines as opposed to DNC emails.
-
Same goes for the term "Russian interference" which is misleadingly vague.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
So there's nothing at all "new" about what I am saying now, it's what I've said from the beginning. https://medium.com/mtracey/russian-hackers-provided-vital-information-to-american-voters-d7fb0f9ec50b#.nzabsywku …
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
and in the case of DNC emails - yes - we should have seen them anyway. Should be part of transparency laws.
-
The DNC is a private organization, so I'm not sure if the public is owed personal emails.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Naive and/or disingenuous.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm a blowhard who demands the CIA and FBI give me direct access to all evidence not matter how sensitive
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.