Very telling. According to this metric, "liberal" Twitter users talked about Trump far more than Hillary in 2016. https://medium.com/echelon-indicators/the-year-in-news-2016-41f876d4c618#.oxg00tg2j …pic.twitter.com/bYetkJtU8b
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
the left tried to tell the liberals, very early, that Hillary needed to stand on her own, with policy. It was oversaturation
It was actually #NeverHillary and they just didn't care.
@mtracey
Also allowed Trump to get his message out unfiltered. Sidestepping media and their bias in "reporting"
FDR = radio JFK = tv Obama = internet Trump = social media
A lot more than "Russian" influence,I suspect.This is where most people get their info about candidates.
But 98% of the Trump coverage was negative. So the net effect was.....what?
I didn't notice that myself
how sad the elite was not talkung about wikileaks. No wonder they were clueless
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.