WaPo report cites second-hand *characterizations* of CIA claims, not even CIA claims themselves. And the characterizations are conflicting.
-
-
the same media that will spread unfounded hysteria on "the Russians" won't identify radical Islamic terror incidents
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They'll be back to reporting the dangers of "fake news" destroying the republic on Monday
@mtraceyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
just like they did regarding intel on Iraq WMD And as then, anyone that doubts the CIA is a traitor or russian agent. Sad
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
no one wants people to "go wild". Remain calm and stay informed will do just fine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hey, we did it before and it turned out great.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
bipartisanship abounds when foreign regime change is on the line
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TroutMaskReplca Russia interfered in#USElection2016 &#trumpsters can't/don't want to see.#racism,#greed or#facts block itThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yet
@CBSNews ran the#fakenews theme today;mentioning the@washingtonpost article that mentioned the@CIA reports that mentioned..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.