Federal judge wisely halts the Michigan recount, dismissing Stein's claims as spurious http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2016/12/07/federal-judge-halts-michigan-election-recount/95110008/ …
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
By all means advocate for voting system reforms, but that ought to be done legislatively, not in the context of a baseless "recount."
12 replies 21 retweets 95 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
Key passage from Judge Goldsmith's ruling here. This is where the whole thing should have begun and ended.pic.twitter.com/ByDxA32jVh
7 replies 43 retweets 85 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
no need to find out how many absentee ballots werent counted cause ppl were removed from rolls.http://www.sevenstories.com/blogs/31-a-note-on-the-taboo-subject-of-stolen-elections …
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @daria_rylkova
These issues can all be investigated by other methods: no need for a "recount" based on false premises to address them.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
starting a recount is how u begin to address them. Recounting absentee ballots esp imp in WI-28% were absentee vs 21% in '12
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @daria_rylkova
There is no need for a recount based on fears of "Russian hacking" in order to spur investigations/improvements.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
i havent heard Stein pushing the Russian interference idea outside of that statement. More likely Rs interfered in various ways
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
She keeps referencing it in court filings and public statements.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.