The "popular vote" dead-enders are deluding themselves. HRC is not "the winner" of the election. She's a loser. It's over. @NicholsUprisingpic.twitter.com/2IJh6FDoC4
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Trump won per the requirements set forth by the Constitution, which have been in effect since 1788. Quit being sore losers.
not to mention, we really don't want to adapt to using just the popular vote, bc then most states would lose their voice completely
Regardless, none of these folks would be lamenting the structural rigging of democracy if Trump won the pop vote but lost the EC.
Of course not.
As even Trump pointed out – in popular vote system, campaigning would be way different
your common sense is so refreshing. Pragmatism is rare these days, where people need to skew something to make sense in their head
Even if popular vote had any relevance, she loses when you combine the anti-Clinton votes (trump, johnson,stein)
How are you a liberal and get this?
too bad the corporate media isn't going to tell Clinton Dems that little fact
I thought more populated states get more electoral college voters. That reflects population in particular states?
imagine a system where someone wins the presidency with 40% of the popular vote. #scary
I married the 2 systems together. If you get >50%, you get all the Electoral Votes, otherwise, they are divided up based on %.
Trump still wins.
Yep, it's a 50 state slog.
& yet they stay quiet about HRC Superdelegates & how every state in the US gets 2 Senate seats regardless of the state's size.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.