-
-
Replying to @mtracey
it's a fair argument. Only empirical thing I'd point to is Toomey and to lesser degree RonJohn. Different ways of skinning same cat
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LPDonovan @mtracey
I'll put it this way- it's easier to a Rubio or a Kasich over the hump to 270 than it is to get them through the primary gauntlet.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LPDonovan @mtracey
But does Rubio win MI? Man, I dunno. The other element of this was inadvertent rope-a-dope. They would've been less presumptuous.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LPDonovan
I'm pretty comfortable declaring that Rubio could not have won MI, WI, PA. But yes he could've won VA.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
MI highly doubtful. Could have certainly won PA/WI IMO, but his map looks v different. I just think HRC takes less for granted.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @mtracey
in the end that's what this comes down to. pure hubris. they thought those were locked until last week.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
They should've visited PA, OH, NC with me and discovered otherwise. Weapons-grade hubris.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.