You won't find one.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey @grabmybutstick
Did you not maintain that Trump's FP would be less neoconservative than Hillary's?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @SamAdlerBell
I maintained that the most notorious neocons had flocked to HRC, and that would not be contradicted by a Bolton nomination.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @SamAdlerBell
And as I just said, Bolton is horrible but he is not a neocon.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
Bolton nom would be a preliminary indication that your hope for a more isolationist/less destructive Trump FP was misplaced. y/n?
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @SamAdlerBell
I didn't place "hope" in Trump, that's a spurious way to put it. I more condemned HRC.
1 reply 3 retweets 8 likes -
-
Replying to @SamAdlerBell
I never made any definitive statements about who would be worse. Please stop mischaracterizing.pic.twitter.com/WjauuWJZKM
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @SamAdlerBell
If you want to run around characterizing my positions, please cite actual quotes.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
when confronted w fact that Trump's advisors suggested comparably bad FP, you cited fact that Bolton did NOT have formal role.pic.twitter.com/aKKeZfnUjx
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes
Um because that was true, it doesn't mean I ever said Bolton couldn't be nominated
-
-
Replying to @mtracey @SamAdlerBell
I actually specifically said in a chat with
@RaniaKhalek that Trump has cited Bolton as an influence1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Your little crusade is getting tiresome. You know I never remotely endorsed or advocated for Trump.
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes - 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.