Clinton loyalists can talk about how the "data" was on their side, but the data *always* showed that Sanders was the stronger candidate.
-
-
except.... he's not a Democrat. So, FO. Go make your own damn party.
@SallyAlbright -
Problem. Dems thnk they r the chosen. They weren't, were they? She caused Trump .
@Oldgringo12@mtracey@SallyAlbright - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think so. He's not even a Democrat.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Two dynasties -- Clinton and Bush -- have bitten the dust this year. That alone is good reason to cheer
#ccot -
Hardly. Clinton is still in the hearts and minds of Dems. Its you fleas who are riding a dead dog
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
For a movement, I think your leader needs more of a "big idea" than "I'm female, not Trump, and it's my turn dammit!"
-
If you think Clinton had no actual policies or ideas, you were getting too much of your information from Russians.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@tovangar2 Don't forget Tulsi and Nina
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
when r u gonna accept it? Get your own damn party. BS isnt and never was a Dem. After this Trump fiasco, socialists be dead.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
may I remind you the Bernie hasn't even become a member of the Democratic Party... even after all this.
-
Why would he after they burned him in the primary? Their Despicable behavior gave us 45.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Right. Cause an 80 year old white dude is the face of the future. LOL
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
.
@mtracey What I wrote a year ago still holds true:pic.twitter.com/D7k6UwlJIw
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.