"Poor email practices" is such a dishonest way of describing the HRC server matter: that's the phrase people use to trivialize what happened
-
-
Here's a good resource. The most bald, explicit lie was HRC's July 2015 claim that she did not receive a subpoena. http://www.factcheck.org/2016/09/the-fbi-files-on-clintons-emails/ …pic.twitter.com/hhmrhmdwwB
-
HRC also deceived Democratic primary voters into thinking that she was *not* under FBI criminal investigation, when she most certainly was.pic.twitter.com/c0eNiM3l7U
-
The FBI never conducted a "security review." They conducted a criminal investigation to determine whether HRC personally committed felonies.
-
HRC knew this. She is a lawyer. Her lawyers were in communication with the FBI for months up to this point. She purposely, explicitly lied.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
and "treasonous email practices" is the most correct way to describe what she did.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Quicksilver2723 But, remember, anything said in the course of a campaign are essentially "political promises". You know, Lies.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She's been deceiving ppl for 30 yrs. Her final contribution was to suggest completely non-racist ppl are racist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@whpresscorps Security review???Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@zachhaller This has been a subject in my thoughts for a long time. How is it she's a legit candidate when she misled electorate?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.