For instance, I broadly supported the Sanders campaign, but that didn't prevent me from covering it adversariallyhttps://newrepublic.com/article/122309/bernie-sanders-archive-bustling-mysterious-young-men …
-
-
-
I dunno, maybe I'm weird, but it doesn't seem adversarial. It's just an article about a bit of news, IMO.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
They're writing for an audience: the folks who enjoy a good TPP slow jam or finding which pols like the same hot sauce they do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
As they proved with Trump...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Without actually lynching Hillary ,I don't see how the press could have been more adversarial over the decades.Do you ,really?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@14kimblais@realDonaldTrump. It's wonderful when 2 souls meet UNLESS it's your JOB to be OBJECTIVE. Reporters dream of Nixon.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In becoming enablers of their favored campaign, they killed their credibility.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They'll find out that the type of symbiosis w/Hillary is the type where she is PARASITIC. It will seem mutual, BUT NO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.