a portion who are people with grievances/concerns/fears that deserve to be heard? I agree that 50-50 is a terrible way to make >>
-
-
Replying to @ProducerMcD @mtracey
that distinction, but you and Clinton are making the same distinction. (Which does not undermine your larger thesis, mind you.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProducerMcD
The portion who are online trolls is a minuscule subset. Using them to make sweeping generalizations, as HRC did, is wrong.
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
I agree it's wrong. Also think it's worth a good conversation (among all Americans) whether that subset is minuscule. But >>
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProducerMcD @mtracey
>> it also seems wrong to identify people in your piece and assume, without further consideration, they would be in her 1st basket.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProducerMcD
Attempting to parse which percentage would be in which basket is fruitless; thus the intrinsic flaw of HRC's rant.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
Sure, a valid point. I'm not parsing the %. I guess I'm puzzled at why you believe your evident empathy toward, say, the Amish >>
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProducerMcD @mtracey
farmers in your piece is not what Clinton is referring to when she says to "empathize with" some Trump supporters. Seems relevant.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProducerMcD @mtracey
I should add, it was the intrinsic flaw of Trump's Mexico rant ("some, I assume, are good people") which is why it never makes >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProducerMcD @mtracey
when people say "he called all Mexicans criminals and rapists." It needlessly overstates the actual quote and harms a counter case.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I agree with that. Longtime fan of WTF, BTW.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.