What prevents HRC herself from "fact-checking" Trump if necessary? Why whine for the moderators to intervene when she can just do it?
-
-
moderator should focus on correcting stuff like dates, numbers, wrong quotes etc. Broader policy arguments are up to the candidates
-
That sounds reasonable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Your opponent saying you're factually wrong comes across less credibly than a theoretical third party.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this a "woman card" thing? Inability to take an authoritative stance on the facts?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Arguably, a debate between only two people doesn't even need a moderator.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
DT just might "fact check" HRC. All has to do is give impression that he=arbiter-of-truth by "calling her out" even if erroneous.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
he's such a liar that if she spends ALL her time fact checking, she won't get to talk abt anything else!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
it's all an appeal to authority. They want the audience to see the moderator as the arbiter of Clinton's ver. of the truth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is an admission of defeat. A vote of no confidence in HRC and of her leadership. She wont get timeouts with world leaders either
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
@Ricky_Vaughn99 : Seems a little " unpresidential" doesn't it?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.