Referring to voters who oppose you as "deplorables" and "irredeemable" is pretty odd. Paging Mitt Romney.......https://twitter.com/rubycramer/status/774426188274102272 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Oops -- correction, "deplorable" is the noun. Same thing applies: that's creepy and arrogant.
Deplorable is an adjective, but we'll let that go in favor of your main point. It's still creepy (also an adjective).
Don't be so hard on her. Dementia causes confusion btween the person in the mirror & other people as "irredeemable" & "deplorable".
how are they redeemable? Love to hear your plan.
if they're irredeemable, should they be locked up & kept away for the good of society? Who is this strategy winning over?
She'll get away with it.
seemingly. But this is why her poll numbers always trend down when she campaigns
25% of the voting public, WOW.
if she said 15% it would be fine......but 50%?!
a kernel? Seriously? There's a lot of truth to it. It's unfortunate and sad, but that doesn't make it untrue.
A kernel??? 20% is a low estimate, you fool. Did you even read the evidence by reuters that was tweeted to you??
and perfect for showing that you--and, therefore, anyone who votes for you--are *not* bad.
Confirms this election as a civil war of one half against the other.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.