My column on the media's lazy assessment of Trump's foreign policy views -- inspired by an exchange w/ @chrislhayes:http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/michael-tracey-donald-trump-wasn-pro-war-hillary-clinton-article-1.2785974 …
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
Analytical error here is assumption that because he deviates from foreign policy consensus Trump is an anti-interventionist.
2 replies 0 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
He's exhibited anti-interventionist inclinations to a far greater degree than HRC -- that should be beyond dispute.
6 replies 3 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
Nope. He's a unilateralist, not an anti-interventionist. Big difference. He wants to intervene without meddling allies & rules.
5 replies 2 retweets 37 likes -
-
Replying to @mtracey
If your slogan is "Take the oil" & "to the victor belongs the spoils" (both Trump phrases), they are wxclusive
3 replies 1 retweet 20 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
He exhibits greater anti-interventionist tendencies than HRC -- doesn't mean he's some pristine, faultless anti-interventionist
3 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
You acknowledge that HRC is one of the most recalcitrant Iraq dead-enders in the entire country, right?
2 replies 2 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
Sure, but a little less than Trump who wants USA to go back to Iraq to take the oil.
4 replies 1 retweet 12 likes
-
-
@mtracey do you still stand by this assessment or have you evolved1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @screenslaver @HeerJeet
There's nothing in the assessment that is somehow now wrong. If you disagree, identify specifically what was wrong.
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.