8) If you take a 4 pt lead for Clinton and turn it gray for tossup, and a 2 pt lead for Trump and turn it red, your methodology is suspect.
-
-
Replying to @Lollardfish
It's an interactive tool for fiddling with electoral maps. Many pubs do similar. I don't see anything nefarious about it at all
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @Lollardfish
Certainly using it as evidence that the AP is somehow going easy on Trump, as Kendzior does, is completely ridiculous.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
that is not my point. It's not about going easy, but about preserving horse race discourse.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @mtracey @Lollardfish
The only reason that Blue Nation Review contributor Kendzior took note of this is because she's on a crusade against the AP
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
AP has been pretty bad lately. Still not on par with CNN hiring Lewandowski, but pretty bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lollardfish
No, the Foundation stuff has been rigorous, needed journalism -- it just enrages Clinton partisans who want her shielded.
1 reply 5 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
I agree that the journalistic question - what were connections bt CF and Clinton as SoS - is a good one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lollardfish @mtracey
The framing of creating a "set" so that you can write, "more than half" is the kind of discourse question I find interesting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
They specifically stated that the "set" was comprised of non-governmental people who got private meetings.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey @Lollardfish
That "set" could be expanded if the State Dept. released the remainder of the pertinent records, instead of concealing them.
0 replies 1 retweet 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.